|
Here's an expanded take on Operation BAGHDAD THUNDER, and it has not just the USN, but the Air Force, Marines, RAF, Saudis, as well as some of the POWs, Soviets, and a few Iraqis, too. Read and enjoy.
Five Minutes Over Baghdad: Operation BAGHDAD THUNDER Based on the History Channel documentary Target Baghdad
During the Third World War, several U.S. and NATO air operations had an effect beyond their intended objectives, whether it was the killing of the KGB Chairman during Operation MOSCOW MULE, or the neutralization of CINC-WEST and his headquarters by the RAF that same morning, as well as the initial NATO air response to the Warsaw Pact attack on Europe. However, there was one operation that, while initially intended as an embarrassment to the Iraqi regime, contributed to the premature end to Iraq's offensive in Kuwait, and paved the way for U.S. and Coalition offensive operations in Kuwait, and ultimately, the drive to the Euphrates. While some historians still feel that it was an operation planned and pushed by a naval aviator with a personal score to settle with the Iraqis, most observers, including Soviet/Russian ones, feel that an operation similar to this one would have been executed sooner or later. The author of the raid simply had an outline of a mission plan and a tentative strike template. Detailed planning at the Carrier Air Wing level, and ultimately at CENTAF, made sure that the mission went from a paper concept to a mission whose execution that is still being studied and reflown via computer simulation at air academies and Air War Colleges today. It became known as BAGHDAD THUNDER.
Operation BAGHDAD THUNDER had one primary author, although those at Carrier Air Wing 5 and at CENTAF fleshed out the plan and made it a viable concept. Lieutenant Commander (now Capt.) Matt Wiser was the acting Executive Officer and Operations Officer for Attack Squadron 115 (VA-115) aboard the carrier U.S.S. Kitty Hawk. He became acting exec after Cmdr. Don Gilfry was shot down on the H-2 mission on 25 April 2005, and was also in his previous job of Squadron Operations Officer when he saw a replay of an Iraqi TV broadcast of interviews with Coalition Prisoners of War on CNN. When he saw his girlfriend, Lieutenant Commander (now Cmdr.) Lisa Eichhorn on TV, he became enraged and had to be forced out of the VA-115 ready room. Calming down later, he went back to his cabin, and then returned to his squadron commander, Commander. John Compton, with a mission proposal and a strike template. Commander Compton was impressed enough to take the plan to his opposite number in VA-185, Commander Amanda Lowry. Both squadron commanders asked the VA-115 Exec if his mind was clear and that this proposal wasn't about a newly-developed grudge or having scores to settle. Reassuring his two superior officers that he wasn't out to settle any grudges, and pointing out that the Iraqis had been bragging about how the Allied Air Forces were cowards in avoiding Baghdad's Air Defenses. Hitting two or three of Baghdad's main airfields would remind the Iraqis that the Allied Air Forces could hit whatever they wanted, and whenever they wanted, and hitting the Al-Rashid Air Base would also give a morale boost to the Allied POWs held at the nearby Al-Rashid Military Prison. A side effect would be a likely purge by the Iraqi dictator of his air force and air defense commanders, regardless of who was really at fault. Impressed with Lt. Cmdr. Wiser's presentation, both squadron COs took the plan to Capt. Charles Seavey, CAG-5. After reviewing the plan, Seavey gave the plan to his Air Wing staff, and after consulting with Lt. Cmdr. Wiser, fleshed out the plan and presented it to Rear Admiral Roger Freeman, Commander of TF-77 and the Multinational Battle Force Middle East. After the plan gained their approval, it was sent on the line to CENTAF.
CENTAF's planners added some ideas of their own. The USAF had a number of its own aircrew who were now POWs in Iraq, and they wanted in on the action. Similarly, the two newly-arrived USMC squadrons, which had already seen some combat, and the A-6 squadron already had lost a plane and a crew, with one known POW and one MIA, also wanted to join the party. The RAF's Middle East Force also had a score to settle, and they too, to quote a CENTAF planner, “joined the fun.” The Royal Saudi Air Force also wanted in, and they were assigned strikes in support of the main effort. The plan also involved every Allied tanker in the Middle East, including Navy S-3s rigged up with buddy stores, Marine KC-130s, Saudi KC-130s and KE-3As, RAF VC-10s, and USAF KC-135s and KC-10s. Tanker tracks were assigned south of the Iraqi-Saudi border, in an area where Iraqi radar had already been neutralized, and a maximum effort would go the morning of the mission. Not to be left out were the Combat Search-and-Rescue forces, with U.S. Navy helicopters on alert in the Northern Arabian Gulf, U.S. Army “Night Stalkers” on standby in Kuwait, and both USAF and RSAF helicopters and USAF HV-22 Ospreys on alert at Saudi bases near the border.
When finished, the plan was a much more detailed and expanded version of Commander Wiser's initial proposal, which envisioned a full Air Wing Alpha Strike. Instead, the bulk of CENTAF's strike elements, and its entire tanker force, was committed to the mission. After the final plan was issued to the squadrons that would execute it, and VA-115 received its official Air Tasking Order for BAGHDAD THUNDER, as CENTAF titled the mission, Lt. Cmdr. Wiser told his CO, “Skipper, I planned a small party for a few close friends. Now the whole neighborhood's coming along for the ride.” Commander Compton laughed, and said “Guru (Wiser's call sign), no plan survives first contact with the planners, let alone the enemy.”
Lieutenant Commander Wiser had not even given a date to launch the mission, simply asking “as soon as the ATO allows.” The Iraqis inadvertently gave a prime date to execute the strike, announcing a parade of POWs through Downtown Baghdad on 28 April. CENTAF Intelligence picked it up via monitoring Iraqi State TV and Radio, and the planners in Doha decided that the strike should be timed for just after the start of the parade, with time-on-target scheduled for 1305 local Baghdad Time, or 1005 Zulu, five minutes after the parade's beginning, with launch time set for 0900 local.
The mission called for two main supporting strikes by the Saudis, and the RSAF drew the airfield and Intercept Operations Center at As-Salman Air Base, and the An Najaf IOC, co-located with the An Najaf Civil Airport. The Saudis contributed eight Tornado IDSs for the As-Salman strike from their No. 83 Squadron at Dhahran, four with JP-233 anti-runway munitions, and four with GBU-10E laser-guided bombs for the IOC, with four F-15Cs from No. 13 Squadron flying top cover. The Tornados would also carry ALARM antiradar missiles for any SAM-suppression, along with ECM pods and Sidewinder missiles for self-defense. The RSAF's No. 92 Squadron at Taif got tasked with the An Najaf IOC, and they too, carried GBU-10Es to deal with the bunker. Two Tornados carrying ALARM missiles would support the strike, from No. 66 Squadron at Dhahran, while four more Eagles from No. 13 Squadron would escort the attack birds, though the F-15S crews felt that they didn't need any escort.
While the RSAF was taking down the two IOCs, the RAF and the Marines would play their part. Just after the IOCs were to be hit, the Marines would send eight A-6Fs from VMA(AW)-121 and eight F/A-18Cs from VMFA-235 in on a decoy strike. They would carry a mix of TALD decoys and HARM missiles, and would launch some decoys in towards the Baghdad MEZ (Major Engagement Zone), but would launch the majority of their decoys against the air base at Kut Al Haay East. Hopefully, any airborne MiGs in the Baghdad area would be committed against the decoys, enabling not only the RAF birds, but the two main strike packages, a clear shot into the Baghdad area. The RAF, meanwhile, had the job of knocking out Iraq's known SA-5, SA-10, and SA-12 SAM sites. The weapon chosen was the Storm Shadow-B, a submunition variant of the basic Storm Shadow, and ideal for dealing with SAM sites. The Tornados would also carry ALARMs to deal with any SAM radars that did come up. Five known heavy SAM sites were targeted, and the remaining Storm Shadows were intended for some of the SA-2 and SA-3 sites that also ringed the Iraqi Capital.
The main event would be strikes on three targets in the Baghdad metro area proper. CVW-5 would attack both the Al-Rashid and Al-Muthena Air Bases in Southeast and Northwestern Baghdad, while the Air Force was tasked against Saddam International Airport, which also housed Iraqi Air Force interceptor and heavy transport squadrons. CVW-5's A-6 squadrons would pack a pair of GBU-24 laser bombs and a pair of HARM missiles, along with single Sidewinders and AMRAAMs for self-defense. The Navy's Hornets would play a key role, as eight Hornets were tasked with Strike Escort, with a mixture of AGM-65 Maverick Missiles and Mark-20 Rockeye CBUs, and four other Hornets were tasked with IRON HAND, or SAM-suppression, with each Hornet packing a pair of JSOWs and a pair of HARMs for dealing with SAM or AAA sites. Four other Hornets would also launch decoys, hoping that the SAM radars would come up and reveal themselves for HARM shots, while also acting as a CAP in the area for any MiGs that appeared. Four EA-6B Prowlers would provide ECM support, with two acting as standoff jammers and two escorting the strike in and out of the target area. Finally, F-14Ds would provide the MIGSWEEP and TARCAP (Target Combat Air Patrol) needed to cover the strike force.
The Air Force, meanwhile, for their strike on Saddam International Airport, brought a dozen F-15Es, armed with GBU-10 variants for either hard or soft targets, while both F-15Fs and F-16CJs provided WILD WEASEL and strike escort, but F-16s would also launch decoys as well, to bring up SAM sites so that the Weasels could “troll for SAMs.” F-15Cs would ride shotgun on the Air Force element, providing their own Target CAP for not only their own strike, but the egressing Navy planes as well. In addition, two USAF EF-111Bs would provide standoff ECM support, and act as additional HARM shooters if necessary.
On egress from their respective target areas, all three strike groups would overfly not only the Al-Rashid Military Prison, where Iraq was holding the POWs, but also the Parade Ground and reviewing stands at what some maps called the Victory Arch, or the Hands of Victory on others. It was expected that the POWs being paraded would be right on the parade ground at the time, and not only would this be a boost to their morale, but would embarrass the Saddam regime, and the loss of face would be sufficient to compel the Iraqi dictator into a purge of his Air Force and Air Defense Command.
Once their assigned missions were completed, each strike element would meet up and head south back to Saudi airspace and the tankers, before returning to base. All aircrew were also reminded of a 25-NM “No-Rescue Zone” around Baghdad, as the CSAR people felt that any closer to the Iraqi Capital and its defenses would be too much of a risk to the Search-and-Rescue helicopters. Otherwise, the CSAR crews were willing to go in anywhere and attempt recovery of downed aircrews.
The planners of BAGHDAD THUNDER faced a formidable defense. Baghdad, according to the Gulf War Air Power Survey published in 1992, had twice the density of the most heavily defended target areas in Eastern Europe, and was considered more heavily defended than Murmansk. While the Capital's air defenses had suffered during the Gulf War and the immediate years afterward, the Soviet refusal to renew the arms embargo on Iraq in 1995 opened the door for Iraqi rearmament, and not only was Iraq's Army and Air Force reequipped, but the Air Defense Command as well. Soviet advisors came into Iraq to help rebuild the air defense infrastructure, and Soviet Air Force flight instructors arrived to help the Iraqi Air Force retrain and reequip its interceptor squadrons.
The Iraqi Capital was right in the middle of the 1st Air Defense Sector, with the National Air Defense Operations Center located at Al-Muthena AB, adjacent to Air Force Headquarters. A Sector Operations Center was at the Al-Taiji Air Base, north of Baghdad, and Intercept Operations Centers were at Taiji, Al-Taqquadim, Salman Pak, Kut, Nukhayb, and An Najaf. These controlled SAM sites, AAA batteries, and airborne interceptors against inbound air threats. While Iraq's air defense system had largely been integrated by the French, it had been dismantled by the Gulf War, and the Soviets rebuilt it, though the Iraqis insisted that the system's outline conform to what it had been in 1990.
Iraq after 1995 began receiving Soviet SAMs that were very capable systems. Although a 1960s-70s era system, the SA-5 was more than capable of medium-to-high altitude air defense, and was a threat to USAF U-2s and to UAVs that patrolled Iraqi airspace since the end of the Gulf War. Two batteries had been situated near Basra, four more that guarded both Mosul and Kirkuk, and four more around Baghdad itself. Meant to shoot down B-52s and B-58s, the SA-5 was also a potential threat to AWACS and ELINT aircraft, but against maneuvering targets such as strike fighters, it was less of a problem. In addition, Allied ELINT and EW systems were very familiar with the SA-5's Square Pair radar, and that radar was easily jammed. Furthermore, the reprisal attacks on Iraq for its use of CW ensured that the Basra and Baghdad SA-5 sites were visited by cruise missiles, but one of the Baghdad SA-5 sites was still considered a threat on 28 April.
Iraq was also one of the first Middle East customers for the SA-10 Grumble. It received its SA-10s in 1999, after Operation DESERT FOX, and observers widely believed that the Soviets sold the SA-10 to Iraq to show their displeasure with the U.S. and Britain over the operation. Four SA-10 batteries were sold to Iraq, with the export version (SA-10f) the system delivered. With a range of up to 93 miles, and an effective altitude up to 88,000 feet, the SA-10 was a very dangerous missile system to defeat, and NATO airmen in Europe had already learned by 28 April that the Grumble was a capable weapon. CENTAF had already learned on D-Day that the Iraqis were using it, shooting down an F-15E on the afternoon of D-Day, and later on, killing a second Strike Eagle on 26 April. While normally used by the Soviets as a mobile system, the Iraqis developed fixed battery sites that their SA-10s would move to at random, complete with hardened revetments for launchers and radars, bunkers to provide living quarters, and munitions storage for reloads.
Iraq, fearing Iranian and Israeli missile attack, also received the SA-12 system, the only Soviet ally outside the Warsaw Pact to do so. The SA-12a Gladiator was used for inner Antimissile defense, while also being very capable of engaging aircraft from low level up to 100,000 feet. The SA-12b Giant had a range of 62 miles, and the same effective altitude. While used as an Army- and Front-level air defense missile in Soviet and Warsaw Pact service, Iraq's SA-12 battery was mainly employed to defend Baghdad, and while often sharing battery sites with SA-10s, four dedicated battery sites were built for the SA-12 in the Baghdad area.
Complementing the SA-5s, SA-10s, and SA-12s were the “old reliables”, the SA-2 and SA-3. The SA-2s provided medium to high level coverage, while the SA-3 handled the low to medium altitudes. While dated, the Soviets had provided upgrade programs, installing new radars, improved fire control, and more ECCM to both systems, making them relatively capable threats. However, a major Allied ELINT effort targeted at Iraq had detected most of the work, and Allied ECM systems were able to counter the threat posed by the upgraded SA-2 and SA-3. Both strike escort and SAM-suppression aircraft would be able to deal effectively with the newer SA-2s and -3s.
For local defense of the Baghdad area, the Iraqis had concentrated their remaining Roland launchers, along with SA-6s and SA-8s belonging to the Republican Guard Forces Command. The Roland, a French-made weapon, had proven effective in the Iran-Iraq War, and had accounted for several Coalition aircraft in the 1991 conflict, but the effects of the embargo and the cutoff of spare parts, replacement missiles, and maintenance support from the manufacturer, had crippled most of the Roland launchers Iraq had, but enough were still usable, that they were a potent threat to any low-level penetration into Baghdad's airspace. Alongside the Rolands were the Soviet SA-6 and SA-15, both operated by the RGFC, with the SA-6 being used to defend Baghdad proper, and the SA-15 being the divisional SAM used by the RGFC's 5th “Baghdad” Mechanized Division. The SA-6, the scourge of Israeli aircraft in 1973, had its fangs removed by the Israelis in 1982, and was well-known to the Allies. The same could be said for the SA-8, which in Soviet service in the 1980s, was a divisional-level SAM for the Soviet Army and the Warsaw Pact. The Iraqis had purchased the system as a weapon meant for not only RGFC and Army heavy divisions, but was also used by the Iraqi Air Force for base air defense, with single batteries deployed at each of Baghdad's three airfields. The SA-15 was a more recent weapon, being a replacement for the SA-8 in Soviet and Warsaw Pact service, and the Baghdad Division was the only Iraqi unit equipped with the system. A much more modern system than its predecessor, the SA-15 not only could fire on two targets simultaneously, but had EO backup fire control if the radar was jammed or decoyed. CENTAF's Intelligence had conflicting information on whether or not the Iraqi SA-15s were operational, but they were assumed to be so, and the strike escort aircraft were advised that SA-15 launchers, along with both Tunguskas and ZSU-23-4s, were priority targets.
Besides the SAMs, there were the guns. Baghdad was literally filled with antiaircraft artillery, with calibers ranging from the 14.5-mm ZPU heavy machine gun mount all the way up to the 100-mm KS-19, with the 57-mm S-60 being the most common. All three major airfields had several batteries, as well as the lighter guns, such as the ZU-23, being mounted on rooftops, and were often partnered with soldiers equipped with MANPADS. The ZSU-23-4 was also available, used by the Special Republican Guard, while the Republican Guard's 5th Division had become the first Iraqi unit to be equipped with the 2S6 Tunguska gun/missile system. This system, which mounted two 30-mm guns and eight SA-19 SAMs, had proven to be lethally effective in Europe, as many NATO aircrew had found out to their sorrow, but whether or not the Iraqi systems were fully operational was an unknown quantity to the mission planners.
The Iraqi Capital's other air defenses were its MiG and Mirage Squadrons of the Iraqi Air Force's Air Defense Command. Three squadrons were directly responsible for defending Baghdad, with the 4th Fighter Squadron based at Saddam IAP with the MiG-29, the 9th Fighter Squadron at Al-Muthena AB, also with the MiG-29, and the 2nd Fighter Squadron at Al-Rashid AB with the MiG-23ML. Backing up these three squadrons were the 96th FS at Al-Taqquadim AB with the MiG-25PDS, the 6th FS at Habbinyah AB with the MiG-29, and two additional MiG-29 squadrons at Samarra East AB, the 73rd and 79th. Two Mirage F-1 squadrons belonging to the Iraqi AF's Support Command were based at Kut Al Haay East AB, the 91st and 92nd, and they could be called upon if needed. The Iraqi AF had spent the time between the resumption of Soviet and East European arms shipments and the outbreak of war training, under the watchful eye of Soviet AF and Voyska PVO advisors, and Voyska PVO had also helped in the reconstitution of Iraq's air defense system.
The Soviets had rebuilt the Air Defense System with its radars, guns, missiles, and interceptors, but instead of replicating the Soviet system, the Iraqis insisted on their 1990 setup, and the Soviets reluctantly agreed. One item that the Soviets did insist on, and it took a lot of persuasion by Soviet Advisors, was that training, both of air defense units, and of fighter squadrons, be as realistic as possible. Saddam Hussein was still deeply suspicious of the Iraqi Air Force, but the Soviets reminded him that if he wanted a military capable of avenging his 1991 defeat, retaking Kuwait and moving into the Gulf States, a well-trained military was needed, and effective training was what was needed to achieve that goal. However, as the events of the first few days of war showed, that while the Iraqi AF was somewhat effective in attacking targets in Kuwait and providing some close air support to ground troops, it was not very effective in either intercepting Allied air attacks or in attacking Allied Warships. And CENTAF's planners took note. Only two Allied aircraft had fallen to MiGs so far, and that figure was not expected to grow very much, much to the disgust of both the Iraqi AF and their Soviet instructors/advisors.
The Allies, meanwhile, brought three main strike aircraft into Baghdad's airspace on 28 April. Despite the lion's share of Allied resources going to NATO's Central Region, CENTAF had at its disposal some of the best strike aircraft in the world to execute the mission. The U.S. Navy's A-6F Intruder was the latest, and last, variant of what many considered the best naval strike aircraft of all time, and two squadrons were available aboard the carrier Kitty Hawk for the mission, along with a shore-based USMC squadron. Capable of carrying up to 18,000 pounds of ordnance, and with new F404 non-afterburning engines, a new nav/attack system, multimode radar, advanced EW system, and one extra weapons station on each wing for self-defense AAMs, the F model Intruder was a much more capable and survivable aircraft than the E model that it had replaced. Intruder aircrew loved their aircraft, and felt that it was more capable than the Air Force's F-15E in the strike arena.
The F-15E was flown by both the USAF and by the RSAF (in the S version) on BAGHDAD THUNDER. A version of the legendary F-15 Eagle, the E was optimized for precision strike and interdiction, while retaining the deadly air-to-air capability of the C model air-superiority fighter. With the LANTIRN (or Sharpshooter system on RSAF aircraft), multimode radar, and a versatile EW system, the Strike Eagle was more than able to handle its own on deep-strike missions. While the Saudis flew a slightly “downgraded” variant, the RSAF proved during the 25 April reprisal strikes that their Eagles were more than able to do the job, and CENTAF was more than willing to bring them into the mission. In all, one USAF and one RSAF squadron each flew Strike Eagles on 28 April.
The Panavia Tornado was the third key striker to fly the mission, flown by both the RAF and the RSAF. The RAF flew the modernized GR.4 variant, with upgraded radar, avionics, and additional weapons systems, such as the Storm Shadow stand-off missile. RSAF Tornados had been scheduled for a similar modernization and upgrade program, but the outbreak of war had halted those plans, with only one squadron's worth of aircraft upgraded. However, there was nothing wrong with either the RSAF's planes or its pilots, as demonstrated on 25 April. The RAF would contribute four aircraft to strike Baghdad's SA-10 and -12 sites, along with the SA-3s and -5s, while the RSAF would contribute aircraft from two squadrons to deal with the supporting strikes on Al Salman AB and the Najaf IOC.
Going into Baghdad's airspace required extensive EW and SAM-suppression support. The USAF provided Wild Weasels for the mission with the F-15F. While the F was essentially a rebuilt B two-seater, the avionics had been upgraded to handle SAM-suppression, with many of the systems previously having been used in the F-4G. The F was also given airframe upgrades, and was still capable of defending itself if necessary, with the Sidewinder and AMRAAM. The HARM antiradar missile was the weapon of choice for the “Weasel Eagles” and could strike radars from over 80 miles away, depending on altitude of the launch aircraft and its EW system. Weasel EWOs could even program HARM to attack specific radars, such as SAM, AAA, early warning, air traffic control, or even weather radars. Many Iraqi air-defense operators who overheard Weasels on the radio dreaded hearing the “Magnum” call, as that signified a HARM launch, and frantic operators would try and shut down their radars before the HARM arrived to do that job for them. On some occasions, that worked, but often, the HARM would remember where the threat radar was located and strike anyway.
While neither the U.S. Navy and Marines, nor the RAF and RSAF, had a aircraft similar to the F-15F, existing platforms were more than capable of dealing with SAMs. The Navy and Marines made do with either A-6Fs or F/A-18s carrying HARMs, while the RAF and RSAF used the ALARM missile for their SAM-suppression. The ALARM could be used as a direct-fire weapon, going straight for the threat radar, but if the radar shut down, the missile would deploy a parachute and its seeker would look for radars still operating. If a threat was detected, the rocket motor would fire again and send the ALARM down to the target. Alternately, the missile could be launched in the loiter mode, and the seeker would be preprogrammed to hunt for specific radars, and if one of the preprogrammed threats came up, the missile would attack that target radar.
For EW, the U.S. Navy brought the EA-6B Prowler to the scene. First deployed in 1971, and continuously upgraded and modernized over the years, the Prowler was one of the most capable EW aircraft in the world. Able to carry up to five ALQ-99 jamming pods, the Prowler carried a four-person crew, and if the mission profile called for it, substitute HARM missiles for ECM pods to give a hard-target kill capability, as opposed to the ECM system's “soft kill.” The Prowler was easily able to perform as either a standoff jammer, or fly as a strike escort ECM platform, and on 28 April, did both.
The EA-6B's counterpart in the USAF was the EF-111B. The EF-111s were rebuilt F-111As, and carried the same ECM system as the EA-6B, but instead of being on external pods, the whole system was mounted internally, and thanks to automation, could be handled by a single EWO, as opposed to the Prowler's two. An upgrade in the 1990s resulted in improved avionics, additional airframe modifications, and a HARM missile capability similar to the Prowler.
Two multirole fighters also played a part in BAGHDAD THUNDER. The F-16C was flown by two USAF squadrons on the mission, with one squadron with the CJ version acting as backup to the F-15Fs, mounting the HARM Targeting System (HTS) pod, and a pair of HARM missiles. Another squadron flew the CG version, which could carry LANTIRN pods, although on this day, that was not necessary. The CGs on 28 April would launch ITALD decoys to fool SAM and AAA operators into turning on their radars, and reveal their locations for HARM shots by the Weasels or strike escorts. The F-16s were also packing Sidewinders and AMRAAMs, for after their primary mission, they would handle TARCAP and BARCAP for the Air Force.
The U.S. Navy and Marines flew two variants of the F/A-18 Hornet on 28 April. The USMC's single squadron, VMFA-235, flew the F/A-18C, while the two Navy squadrons aboard Kitty Hawk flew the improved, and more deadly, F/A-18E. The C model had 25% less fuel than the E, and two fewer weapons stations, but was still a very capable strike fighter. The Marine Cs that flew on 28 April would also carry ITALD decoys in their decoy strike against Kut Al Haay East Air Base, while still carrying Sidewinders and AMRAAMs for air combat. The two carrier-based squadrons, meanwhile, flew the much more capable E model. A new radar and nav-attack system, improved EW and avionics, two more weapons stations, and more internal fuel, made the E model live up to its nickname of “Super Bug.” Eight Navy Super Hornets would fly the IRON HAND mission, which was the Navy's equivalent of the Wild Weasels, carrying both HARM missiles and JSOW stand-off glide bombs to deal with SAM sites, while four more would act as launchers for ITALD decoys, and after launching their decoys would take up a BARCAP station. Eight more Hornets would act as strike escort for the Intruders, with AGM-65 Maverick missiles for use on any SAM or AAA vehicles, and Mark-20 Rockeye CBUs for flak suppression. All still would carry Sidewinder and AMRAAM missiles for aerial combat should that be necessary, and the Super Hornet had already demonstrated that the plane could easily switch from air-to-ground to air-to-air combat and back again, to the Iraqis' sorrow.
As far as purely fighter escorts, with no air-to-ground ordnance to concern them, there were two very capable fighters in the Gulf Region that escorted the 28 April strike. The F-14D Super Tomcat, with its F110 engines, APG-71 radar, digital avionics, and the deadly AIM-54 Phoenix missile, had demonstrated repeatedly since D-Day that, in the words of several Tomcat crew members, “messing around with this cat was not to be advised.” The two F-14D squadrons aboard the Kitty Hawk had begun to run up kills on both defensive CAP to protect ships in the Gulf, and on MIGCAP to protect strike aircraft. So much so that there were two all-female ace teams in squadron VF-154, and as one Soviet advisor said after the war, “if one heard female voices coming from F-14s, the Iraqis were in for a bad day.” While the Iraqis had had experiences with Iranian F-14As in the Iran-Iraq War, the D Tomcat, with its improved Phoenix (both the AIM-54C and D), had proven to be a very unpleasant surprise, and the Tomcat crews took full advantage of their aircraft, giving the Iraqis numerous lessons in what the F-14D was able to do.
The USAF and RSAF brought the F-15C to BAGHDAD THUNDER to complete the picture. While the USAF could have sent an F-22 Raptor squadron to the Middle East, the Raptors were mainly involved in both Europe and Korea, and the F-15C was considered sufficient for the Gulf Region's threat level. Both USAF and RSAF F-15C pilots demonstrated the capabilities of their aircraft repeatedly since D-Day, and while their kill totals were not as high as the Navy's, both USAF and RSAF Eagle drivers had sent a respectable number of Iraqi aircraft and helicopters crashing to the desert floor. The USAF and RSAF “Albino Eagles” would fly both MIGSWEEP and MIGCAP, flying ahead of the strike elements, and giving direct cover to their respective strike packages. One thing all of the fighter pilots on the mission had in common was a hope that the Iraqi Air Force would indeed come up and react to the strike, giving the Allied Fighter Pilots chances to kill Iraqi aircraft within sight of Baghdad itself.
_________________ Treat everyone you meet with kindness and respect. But always have a plan to kill them.
Old USMC Adage
|