History, Politics And Current Affairs

Opinions expressed here are personal views of contributors and do not necessarily represent the companies, organizations or governments they work for. Nor do they necessarily represent those of the Board Administration
It is currently Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:24 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: North Korea
PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:53 pm
Posts: 44
Is there a North Korean Order of Battle made yet?

Also I'd love to know if the Ryugyong Hotel (Pyongyang) was ever completed. In case you've never heard of it, it the "hotel of doom" in the North Korean Capital. A very disturbing design.

Here are some linky's

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryugyong_Hotel
http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=2590901
http://www.mysinchew.com/node/11909
http://www.forbes.com/global/2008/1027/059.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 70858.html
http://www.esquire.com/the-side/DESIGN/ ... oom-012808
http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTech ... 4020080717


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:00 am
Posts: 2591
Location: My house.
The NorK Orbat is going to be similar to what it is in @. Completion of the Ryugyong Hotel depends on finance available to the North Korean government.

_________________
Every man thinks meanly of himself for never having been to sea nor having been a soldier.

- Dr. Samuel Johnson, 10th April, 1778.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:37 pm
Posts: 692
Location: Florida's Capital
JNiemczyk1 wrote:
The NorK Orbat is going to be similar to what it is in @.


Does that mean we might get to see Beagles in action? :D

_________________
It needs but one foe to breed a war, not two.... And those who have not swords can still die upon them. - Tolkien

trekchu wrote:
"Sir, is that your Panzer parked on that disabled spot?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 8:26 pm
Posts: 741
Location: Between Province #314 and #315
The Bushranger wrote:
JNiemczyk1 wrote:
The NorK Orbat is going to be similar to what it is in @.


Does that mean we might get to see Beagles in action? :D



Beagles?

_________________
"Government policy has nothing to do with common sense." - Sir Humphrey Appleby

"Artillery is a God that had never let the Russian Army down."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:25 pm
Posts: 216
Ilyushin Il-28 "Beagle", a late 40s/early 50s Soviet jet bomber. If Wikipedia holds true (big if at times, I know), it seems North Korea got both Russian-built and Chinese-built aircraft, with the Chinese-built version of Il-28 designated Harbin H-5. They do not look too likely to survive against US and South Korean air defence.

_________________
Best regards
Pengolodh
------------------------
Discovery Channel's rocket scientist:
"A rocket has to be versatile and cost-effective: it must be designed specifically for the task at hand."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:37 pm
Posts: 692
Location: Florida's Capital
Indeed.

They're still operational in @ - a recent issue of Combat Aircraft (I think that was it, I lose track sometimes with all my reading :P ) had a feature with satellite shots of a few North Korean airfields, including one with a lineup of Beagles, several of which had fresh scorch marks in the grass behind their parking places.

I've always loved old aircraft, and weird ones - the Il-102 is a particular favourite of mine for some reason...

_________________
It needs but one foe to breed a war, not two.... And those who have not swords can still die upon them. - Tolkien

trekchu wrote:
"Sir, is that your Panzer parked on that disabled spot?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:25 pm
Posts: 216
Il-102 is a strange-looking one, but the Il-40 is even weirder in the looks department.

_________________
Best regards
Pengolodh
------------------------
Discovery Channel's rocket scientist:
"A rocket has to be versatile and cost-effective: it must be designed specifically for the task at hand."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 8:26 pm
Posts: 741
Location: Between Province #314 and #315
Ah. But these crates are blood ancient! Then again, I doubt the NKs have all that much access to modern hardware.

_________________
"Government policy has nothing to do with common sense." - Sir Humphrey Appleby

"Artillery is a God that had never let the Russian Army down."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:37 pm
Posts: 692
Location: Florida's Capital
*reads about the Il-40*

...Sergey Ilushin has just been declared as having emigrated to East Africa in the timeline that's stuck in my head. :D

_________________
It needs but one foe to breed a war, not two.... And those who have not swords can still die upon them. - Tolkien

trekchu wrote:
"Sir, is that your Panzer parked on that disabled spot?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 12:18 pm
Posts: 349
Location: Outer Hoosieria
Man, I knew about the Beagle, but the others were frikking awesome. The Il-102 looks like a flying tank!!!!!

_________________
Remember, wherever you go, there you are....

"The principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale." --Thomas Jefferson

Ciao and cheers!

Tom


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:49 pm
Posts: 121
Location: Porto - Portugal
shermpotter wrote:
Man, I knew about the Beagle, but the others were frikking awesome. The Il-102 looks like a flying tank!!!!!


It has bomb bays in the wings! I wonder how drunk were the designers when they thought of that.

Regarding the Peoples Air Force and their old aircraft, I remember reading (in either Combat Aircraft or Air Forces Monthly, I don't know which) about the USAF-Korea and what they considered the threat of the An-2 Colt dropping special forces in the air bases given "stealthiness" of the canvas covered wings and wood propellers. If it's true or not I don't know but it might make for some nice writing: "The Colt that got Away" :lol:

Protect the Base. Accept follow-on forces. Take the war North.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:37 pm
Posts: 692
Location: Florida's Capital
Bronquites wrote:
It has bomb bays in the wings! I wonder how drunk were the designers when they thought of that.

Well, I thought vodka was Russia's national drink? :D

Quote:
Regarding the Peoples Air Force and their old aircraft, I remember reading (in either Combat Aircraft or Air Forces Monthly, I don't know which) about the USAF-Korea and what they considered the threat of the An-2 Colt dropping special forces in the air bases given "stealthiness" of the canvas covered wings and wood propellers. If it's true or not I don't know but it might make for some nice writing: "The Colt that got Away" :lol:

It's true - the An-2 problem is one that has never been satisfactorialy solved. It's the old problem, a low, slow aircraft (or helicopter) has a major edge in maneuverability over a jet, and is a bad target for missiles. I recall reading about this guy who was flying his composite-and-prop homebuilt around the world, and over the middle east, a Syrian MiG hadn't got the word and came in to attack him, with epic-fail results for the MiG.

As for the Colts, they've tried everything from F-94s back in the day, to OV-10 Broncos as night fighters (!), and nothing has been good enough to stick.

In @, the South Koreans also use An-2s, actually. (Something I learned from the Attrition pages in AirForces Monthly recently when one crashed...). I'd be interested to learn where they came from...

...presumably, though, in TLW-verse, the ROKAF isn't using them, or the Il-103 either, for that matter. :lol:

_________________
It needs but one foe to breed a war, not two.... And those who have not swords can still die upon them. - Tolkien

trekchu wrote:
"Sir, is that your Panzer parked on that disabled spot?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:49 pm
Posts: 121
Location: Porto - Portugal
The Bushranger wrote:
It's true - the An-2 problem is one that has never been satisfactorialy solved. It's the old problem, a low, slow aircraft (or helicopter) has a major edge in maneuverability over a jet, and is a bad target for missiles. I recall reading about this guy who was flying his composite-and-prop homebuilt around the world, and over the middle east, a Syrian MiG hadn't got the word and came in to attack him, with epic-fail results for the MiG.

As for the Colts, they've tried everything from F-94s back in the day, to OV-10 Broncos as night fighters (!), and nothing has been good enough to stick.

In @, the South Koreans also use An-2s, actually. (Something I learned from the Attrition pages in AirForces Monthly recently when one crashed...). I'd be interested to learn where they came from...

...presumably, though, in TLW-verse, the ROKAF isn't using them, or the Il-103 either, for that matter. :lol:


Well, the An-2 did fail in spectacular fashion against the venerable UH-1 in Vietnam. See here.

The Bronco ideia might work. Give it NVG capability and use its MGs to hose down the Colt.

As for common aircraft in both North and South how about the MD500 helicopters. Seems both NorKAF and ROKAF have a bunch of those and they might be used for over the border missions. I wonder how many soldiers in the South can distinguish between "ours" and "theirs" at a glance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 8:31 pm
Posts: 442
Location: Auberry, CA
It took LTJG Guy Bordelon in an F4U-5N to deal with the "Bedcheck Charlies" back in the day. They tried everything: F7F-3Ns, F-94s, F3D-2s, even A-26 Invaders, but it took a Corsair to make sure the NKAF's low and slow night fliers stayed on their side of the line. Most of these intruders were Po-2 biplanes, but some were Yak-9s or Il-10s.

_________________
Treat everyone you meet with kindness and respect. But always have a plan to kill them.

Old USMC Adage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 2:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 9:05 pm
Posts: 159
Bronquites wrote:
It has bomb bays in the wings! I wonder how drunk were the designers when they thought of that.


The Il-2 and Il-10 had that too, as did a number of 1930s aircraft built by other nations. It was done to reduce drag and make it easier for the plane to dive bomb. The only limitation was you couldn’t pack in large bombs but this was irrelevant for close air support missions when a large number of smallish bombs were desired.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:30 pm
Posts: 160
Hey Jan, I've lurked for a long time on the yahoo place, really like the story.

I was just wondering how much influence Beijing has in Pyongyang as opposed to OTL?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:00 am
Posts: 2591
Location: My house.
Glad you enjoy it.

Probably less than in @ because in TLW there is a strong Soviet faction in the NorK politburo and it is currently ascendant. The Chinese faction is against the invasion of the South because they do not believe it can suceed in the current circumstances and they are waiting for it to fail so that they can exploit the situation and oust the Soviet faction.

_________________
Every man thinks meanly of himself for never having been to sea nor having been a soldier.

- Dr. Samuel Johnson, 10th April, 1778.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:30 pm
Posts: 160
JNiemczyk1 wrote:
Glad you enjoy it.

Probably less than in @ because in TLW there is a strong Soviet faction in the NorK politburo and it is currently ascendant. The Chinese faction is against the invasion of the South because they do not believe it can suceed in the current circumstances and they are waiting for it to fail so that they can exploit the situation and oust the Soviet faction.


It's certainly the best WW3 fic I've found (though admittedly not very many)

I wonder if they could get Chinese help.

Wonder how hostile the Chinese are to the Soviets (read that comment about The PLA isn't doing anything, which I personally find to be odd. Discussions at another forum (world affairs board) left me with the impression that in the Eighties, if the Soviets had marched west, the Chinese would have marched north (regardless of the drubbing they'd get). Though I don't know how important those fifty or so divisions in the Russian Far East would be to TLW verse European theater (a Russian general commented to the NATO Parallel History project that their projections showed that they needed those forty divisions to win in Europe, but again, that was during the Eighties).

Thanks again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 8:31 pm
Posts: 442
Location: Auberry, CA
I'll bet the PRC is going to maintain their "watch and wait" posture for the time being. Though there's probably some intelligence-sharing with the U.S. and ROKs re: North Korea and Soviet Forces in the Far East. When the NK offensive runs out of steam-as it will eventually-the pro-Chinese faction in the NK government will probably use a few "premature heart attacks" to influence events north of the 38th Parallel. And if one of those so afflicted is Kim-Jong Il, so be it...

_________________
Treat everyone you meet with kindness and respect. But always have a plan to kill them.

Old USMC Adage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: North Korea
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 8:31 pm
Posts: 442
Location: Auberry, CA
Is there any reliable unclassified NK Order of Battle? There's one for a wargame called Crisis: Korea 1995, but it's probably guesswork.

_________________
Treat everyone you meet with kindness and respect. But always have a plan to kill them.

Old USMC Adage


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group