History, Politics And Current Affairs

Opinions expressed here are personal views of contributors and do not necessarily represent the companies, organizations or governments they work for. Nor do they necessarily represent those of the Board Administration.
It is currently Wed Feb 21, 2018 4:19 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 7:24 am 

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:02 am
Posts: 16312
Location: Planet Earth, Milky Way, Universe
pjmedia.com Leftover Libels of Sebastian Gorka Served up at Rolling Stone
By David P. Goldman August 11, 2017

As Joel Pollak reports in Breitbart this morning, Rolling Stone magazine has refried and repackaged the whole range of lies--comprehensively refuted--against White House adviser Sebastian Gorka. The left-wing media keeps setting a new bar for chutzpah. Central to the Stone story is an attempt to tar Dr. Gorka with guilt by association with right-wing political parties in Hungary, where he was active between 2000 and 2008. "Gorka served as adviser to [Hungary's prime minister Viktor] Orbán," the article states, "who's been called a 'neo-fascist dictator' by Sen. John McCain."

As it happens, the left-wing Jewish news site The Forward offered this allegation in the form of a doctored tape of a 2006 Hungarian television interview with Dr. Gorka. That brought the full interview to light--and the full interview shows Dr. Gorka denouncing Orbán for exploiting popular unrest for nefarious purposes. Sebastian Gorka was not Orbán's "adviser," but a principled and uncompromising critic. I beg the indulgence of readers who have heard all of this before, but it's important to expose the utter mendacity of the leftist media.

It is clear that in Hungary, after last year’s violence, [by the former Communist government] a tangible need for organized self defense emerged. After the assault at the Hungarian National Television HQ, which I witnessed personally, -- and it was interesting because the people there were not mostly 40-year-olds who had lived through the Fall of Communism, but mostly young people who felt society was in trouble -- there was a growing need felt by many Hungarians for a defense of the nation’s soul, and I see Jobbik as having decided to politically exploit this, to politically profit from this societal call for protection. And the most important thing of all, and I stress, the most important thing of all is that this isn’t anything to do with the UDK [Gorka's party], but with Jobbik and that FIDESZ is really behind them and supporting it from the sidelines.

All of this is in the public domain.

Most of the Rolling Stone article is made up of quotes from left-wing academics who attack Dr. Gorka out of a mix of professional jealousy and ideological enmity. The Establishment thinks he is being beastly to the jihadists. Typical is this spitball: "Paul Pillar, a former national intelligence officer for the Middle East, says Gorka is too dangerous to be allowed to remain in the White House: 'Gorka represents an intolerance that offends American values and is likely to gain the United States more enemies than friends.'" That is what one would expect from the "Have-you-hugged-a-Hamasnik?" types.


I am Charlie

 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 27, 2017 7:15 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:35 am
Posts: 5892
Location: Sweden
Since Gorka resigned it has been pointed out that he only did so after being informed by chief of staff Kelly while on a trip that Kelly had revoked his security clearance.
When Gorka then wanted to come to the White House and hand over his resignation to the president in person Kelly refused.

Some people (who aren't liberals this time around) have pointed out that you can't just yank a security clearance like that because you dislike someone.
So the burning question is why did Gorka do to get his clearance revoked and become persona non grata at the White House?

One thing that has been nagging at me for a few months is that some Brits with intelligence community insight have questioned if Gorka's portrayal of his service to Her Majesty is truthful, for instance pointing out that he claimed Northern Ireland counter terrorism when in a unit that was tasked with Eastern Europe work.
Could something like this potentially be it?

The Night Watch - A Star Trek Story

 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group