History, Politics And Current Affairs

Opinions expressed here are personal views of contributors and do not necessarily represent the companies, organizations or governments they work for. Nor do they necessarily represent those of the Board Administration.
It is currently Sun Nov 19, 2017 1:36 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:02 am
Posts: 15793
Location: Planet Earth, Milky Way, Universe
Colin Kaepernick’s “Authentic Islam”-following fiancé: Now you know why Linda Sarsour loves him
2K Geller Report by Katie Jones


Colin Kaepernick, former quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers, has dominated not just sports news, but mainstream headlines since last year, when he began infamously kneeling during the National Anthem to protest police brutality and racial injustice in the United States.

His silent protest turned the NFL and sports entities like ESPN into a hotbed of racial and political tension, real America was once again fed up by cultural Marxism injected into everything, and by the end of the 2016-2017, NFL season ratings were down 9% for regular season games and 6% for the playoffs.

Naturally, Kaepernick has become another one of the left’s darling heroes. Celebrities such as Susan Sarandon, Spike Lee, former President Barack Hussein Obama, and, of course, Linda Sarsour have all touted their praise.

However, without a doubt, Kaepernick’s most ardent supporter is his fiancé, MTV DJ and “Teen Mom” host, Vanessa “Nessa” Diab. It is confirmed the two will have an Islamic wedding, and there is also much speculation that Protestant-raised Kaepernick has converted to Islam. Many sports insiders are adamant that Diab, who supports the National of Islam, is actually the one who pushed him to begin the National Anthem protest. Whether or not there is any credence to these allegations, it is a fact that his public activism did not begin until after he and Diab began dating in 2015.

Diab is a 36-year old American-born Muslim who has stated that she follows “authentic Islam.” She wears short skirts, no hijab, and lots of make up; but her seeming Americanization is weak cover for her Islamic Supremacist and un-American viewpoints. Diab supports the ideologies of Malcolm X and believes the former communist dictator Fidel Castro was a better leader than American ones. She recently called Baltimore Ravens owner Steve Biscotti a “slave master,” and thinks that minorities who like America are suffering from “Stockholm syndrome.” Perhaps the most telling quote about her state of mind comes from a 2014 Guy Code podcast, where she said,

“When 9/11 happened, it didn’t surprise me at all. Wow. Mmkay. This is what we went through [while visiting Saudi Arabia as a child], probably, every couple months.’”

Despite being in the public eye for over a decade, just like most other Muslim activists, her Wikipedia page is extremely bare. The only personal information on the page states that she is an American-born Muslim and her parents are of Egyptian origin. She traveled between the United States and the Middle East for her father’s American corporate job, and claims that because of his job, she was directly placed in a war zone.

“Here is the thing, I was a young girl fearing for my life-I wore gas masks to school,” Nessa said of being present during the Gulf War. “I heard war sirens constantly and I knew at this point I had to break out of this lifestyle.”

You can make your own judgment on the veracity of that claim.

After the American-born citizen was plucked out of safety and placed directly into the eye of danger as a child, she persevered and made it to the University of Southern California, where she majored in mass communications. It was this return to America for college that sparked the beginning of her activism, after she claimed to be a victim of Islamophobia.

Between Kaepernick’s anti-American protest and his Muslim fiancés activism, it was only a matter of time before sharia siren Linda Sarsour latched on.

Sarsour has long been a supporter of Kaepernick’s actions, and last week she spoke at the Justice League NYC and Color of Change rally after no team picked him up for the 2017-18 NFL season. The “I-don’t-understand-what-personal-accountability-is” left believes the NFL not signing Kaepernick (who opted out of his 49ers contract on his own volition this past March) is because of white supremacy. The rally’s organizers called for a boycott of both the NFL and its main sponsor, Verizon Wireless, if Kaepernick is not given a spot in the NFL by the start of the season.

During the rally, Sarsour called for people to rise up against “right-wing Zionists,” and went on to state that “we want you to know that we will not be silenced by ‘blue lives matter,’ by white supremacists, by neo-Nazis, by right-wing Zionists.” She wasn’t finished with her hate-filled anti-Jewish sentiment; she also stated: “People are not like us. The powers that be do not care about morality, or integrity, or dignity, or respect of our communities. They only speak one language, and the language is money,”

After Sarsour’s call for jihad at the Islamic Society of North America dinner earlier this summer, she finally stated something that I agree with: most Americans do not understand what the term means. If more Americans understood the term, they would realize that the host for one of America’s favorite shows, Teen Mom, was using her star power to bring Islamic Supremacy to the United States. Non-Muslims often mistakenly believe that jihad equates to a violent tragedy on the September 11 scale. This is not correct. The truth is that every Muslim has a personal jihad, many of them non-violent, but they all lead to the common goal of Islamic supremacy.

One person’s jihad may be to travel to infidel lands and dress, talk and act like the host country, (which they would NOT be allowed to do in an Islamic country), all the while making the host country feel like Islam isn’t a threat, and secretly laying the groundwork for a later Muslim takeover. Kaepernick’s girlfriend is clearly a master of this form of deception. There is no other explanation for someone who lived in Saudi Arabia and does not speak out about that country’s human rights atrocities but devotes her life to fighting so-called injustices in America. Period.

Kaepernick’s refusal to respect the Star Spangled Banner is not an exercise of his free speech to protest racial injustices; it’s a calculated aim at further division within the United States in order to usher in new forms of society and government. Whether or not Kaepernick himself has converted to Islam, he is certainly being closely influenced by a self-described “authentic” Muslim. We all must look at the historical proof that once Muslims are no longer the minority, they swiftly take control. The words that Winston Churchill allegedly spoke certainly withstand the sands of time, “Muslims are in the minority, they are very concerned with civil rights. When Muslims are in the majority, there are no civil rights.”

_________________
I am Charlie


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:02 am
Posts: 15793
Location: Planet Earth, Milky Way, Universe
Social media giants YouTube, Twitter, Instagram censoring content to the approval of Iran’s Islamic authorities
Geller Report by Pamela Geller

In the twentieth century, the US government used anti-trust laws to dismantle US corporations with far less money and infinitely far less power. Never in the history of mankind has such absolute power in the information battle-space been in the hands of so few. If the body politic understood this and the ramifications of inaction, they would be terrified. And rightly so.

Our events, social media pages, are scrubbed, censored and blacklisted. Shouting into the wilderness is not the freedom of speech. Talking to yourself is not freedom of speech.

The Sherman Antitrust Act ought to be used to break the monopoly these social media giants wield over free speech in social networking sector. Thomas Lifson of the American Thinker sees the problem as I do and supports “legislation that requires social media to censor only direct threats, making it illegal to delete content on any other basis. Social media platforms must be viewpoint neutral. That threat is necessary to counter the pressure Facebook obviously faces from Muslim governments like Pakistan’s. Losing a billion-plus-strong market like the 57 Muslim countries is obviously undesirable for Facebook, so its management is responding to pressure.”

The value of that market would have to be balanced against the value of markets like the United States that could stand up for free speech. By seeming to cave in to the demand that Islam be the only subject that cannot be discussed openly and honestly, anywhere in the world, these social media companies are in the process of handing the first global triumph of sharia, enforcing its ban on blasphemy.

Pamela Geller: Social media First Amendment Lawsuit.

“Western social media firms under fire as Iranians hint at dialogue over censorship,” by Bethan McKernan, Independent, August 30, 2017:

Several social media companies in the West have been criticised for a perceived lack of transparency in alleged talks with the Iranian authorities on censoring content to the approval of the country’s strict religious authorities.

Instagram, currently available in the country – as well as Twitter and YouTube, which are blocked but widely visited by Iranians using proxy servers – have all been reported by local media in recent weeks as as co-operating with the authorities to aid them in blocking or censoring “immoral” content.

Newly installed communications minister Mohammad-Javad Azari Jahromi has been clear that he intends to shake up the status quo, promising citizens easier access to the internet and app platforms.

He has been quoted in several Iranian newspapers as claiming that the government is in fresh talks with social media companies to allow them to operate more freely within Iran as long as they adhere to the country’s strict “morality” rules.

“[Twitter] has announced that it is prepared to negotiate to resolve problems,“ he told a daily newspaper last week, adding that officials had also reached out to YouTube representatives.

In news reports earlier this month, outgoing communications minister Mahmoud Vaezi said that the Supreme Council of Cyberspace (SCC) had also begun talks with managers at photo-based service Instagram to block “immodest” pages from being viewed within the country….

_________________
I am Charlie


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:02 am
Posts: 15793
Location: Planet Earth, Milky Way, Universe
DOJ tried to force pastor to testify on his views of Islam
4 Power LinePower Line by Paul Mirengoff / 48min // keep unread // hide




(Paul Mirengoff) Christian Adams at PJ Media reports that the United State Department of Justice issued subpoenas to force a Christian pastor in Virginia to disclose under oath his views on Islam. Fortunately, today a federal court dismissed the underlying case that gave rise to the subpoena. Nonetheless, the saga reminds us of the abusive leftism of the DOJ.

Steve Harrelson is the pastor of the Mt. Lebanon Baptist Church in Boston, Virginia. He is not a party to any lawsuit or other action brought by the Justice Department. He is a private citizen.

Nonetheless, the Department of Justice subpoened him to testify as to his view of Islam and other matters, and demanded that he bring any papers or documents he has to the deposition with government lawyers that relate to or mention Islam.

The underlying case is a Justice Department action alleging that Culpeper County refused to grant a permit to allow the Islamic Center of Culpeper to pump and haul away sewage. The site of the Islamic Center was unsuitable for a septic system at the time of purchase.

The Center has settled all possible claims against Culpepper County. Under the settlement, the Center will be allowed to pump and haul away sewage.

However, DOJ is pursuing a case against the County. It claims that the County, not Pastor Harrelson or any individual Christian citizen, discriminated in zoning decisions regarding an application to build a mosque. That case is the vehicle for forcing a Christian pastor and other Christians to testify under oath about their views on Islam.

The government’s theory? It’s a novel one developed during the Obama administration. As Adams describes it:

[Z]oning boards can be saddled with any “naked animus or resistance from the community.” In other words, if some people don’t want a mosque in the community, then any zoning decision against the mosque must be because of citizen opposition. It’s the everyone-is-racist if anyone-is-racist theory advanced by academia and others.

DOJ filed the case shortly before President Trump took office. It has continued to pursue it, notwithstanding the advent of the Trump administration.

The two DOJ attorneys listed on the subpoena documents appear to be hard-charging leftists. According to Adams, Onjil McEachin came to the Justice Department from the Department of Housing and Urban Development — purveyor of the notorious “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing” regulation. At HUD, McEachin’s office was deeply involved in advancing disparate impact legal theories to prove racial discrimination.

The other DOJ attorney, Sameena Majeed, was formerly with the Legal Aid Society of the District of Columbia. At Yale, she won the Steere Prize in Women’s Studies for a paper called “Feminist Voices: An Ethnographic Examination of Feminist Consciousness in Urban Pakistani Women.”

McEachin and Majeed are typical of the lawyers hired by the Civil Rights Division during the Obama years. Indeed, PJ Media demonstrated that every lawyer hired was a partisan or ideological leftist. This led the inspector general to recommend that the department end certain hiring criteria that have led to the perception that only lawyers of a certain leftist ideological perspective are hired.

Assistant Attorney General Tom Perez refused to implement the recommendations of the inspector general. Perez may not be “wicked smart,” as former President Obama described him, but he isn’t stupid.

Fortunately, Pastor Harrelson will not have to testify about how he perceives Islam. As noted above, a federal judge today did what the Trump administration should have done months ago — he pulled the plug on the DOJ’s case. Judge Norman Moon ruled that the case was moot because the mosque settled with Culpeper County.

Judge Moon explained:

Taken together, the Government’s additional measures are marginal quibbles that overlook the forest for the trees. They are based on a presumption of bad faith by the County, a presumption supported by little more than bald assertions and which the County has overcome with compelling and unimpeached evidence.

This ruling ends the matter unless the Justice Department appeals. If the Trump DOJ appeals, we’ll have a big story on our hands.

_________________
I am Charlie


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group